← All models
Compare

GLM-5.3-Flash vs Qwen3.7-Max

GLM-5.3-Flash (Z.ai (Zhipu AI)) and Qwen3.7-Max (Alibaba) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeGLM-5.3-FlashZ.ai (Zhipu AI) · 6 in the newsQwen3.7-MaxAlibaba · 4 in the news
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)153154
Coding7562
Math5258
Reasoning & Knowledge5272
Agentic & Tools6978
Specifications
DeveloperZ.ai (Zhipu AI)Alibaba
Family—Qwen
ReleasedAug 20, 2026May 19, 2026
Parameters320B—
AvailabilityOpen weights (unrestricted)API access
Context window1M1M
Price — $/M input$0.13$1.48
Price — $/M output$0.44$4.42
Inputstext, image, videotext
Outputstexttext
Benchmarks
AIME 2024/202594%96%
APEX53%—
ARC-AGI91%—
ARC-AGI-266%—
GPQA Diamond90%91%
Humanity's Last Exam40%41%
SciCode52%50%
SimpleQA Verified32%56%
WebDev Arena16071517
SimpleBench—70%
SWE-bench Verified—77%
τ²-bench—95%

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Is GLM-5.3-Flash better than Qwen3.7-Max?

On Epoch AI's Capabilities Index, Qwen3.7-Max scores higher (154) than GLM-5.3-Flash (153). The right pick depends on your task, so compare their coding, math, and reasoning scores in the table above.

Which is cheaper, GLM-5.3-Flash or Qwen3.7-Max?

GLM-5.3-Flash is cheaper on input tokens at $0.13 per million, versus $1.48 (representative OpenRouter pricing).

Which has a larger context window, GLM-5.3-Flash or Qwen3.7-Max?

Neither: both support up to 1M tokens.

Which is better for coding, GLM-5.3-Flash or Qwen3.7-Max?

GLM-5.3-Flash ranks higher across coding benchmarks like WebDev Arena and SciCode: 75th vs 62nd percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.