← All models
Compare

Claude Opus 5.5 vs Gemini 3.7 Flash

Claude Opus 5.5 (Anthropic) and Gemini 3.7 Flash (Google DeepMind) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeClaude Opus 5.5Anthropic · 3 in the newsGemini 3.7 FlashGoogle DeepMind · 1 in the news
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)157
Coding10091
Math80
Reasoning & Knowledge10085
Agentic & Tools98
Specifications
DeveloperAnthropicGoogle DeepMind
FamilyClaudeGemini
ReleasedSep 22, 2026Aug 13, 2026
Parameters
AvailabilityAPI access
Context window1M1M
Price — $/M input$4.00$0.75
Price — $/M output$20.00$3.75
Inputstext, image, filetext, image, video, file, audio
Outputstexttext
Benchmarks
Humanity's Last Exam61%39%
SciCode67%60%
AIME 2024/202597%
APEX68%
ARC-AGI96%
ARC-AGI-285%
GPQA Diamond95%
SimpleQA Verified69%
WebDev Arena1587

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 5.5 or Gemini 3.7 Flash?

Gemini 3.7 Flash is cheaper on input tokens at $0.75 per million, versus $4.00 (representative OpenRouter pricing).

Which has a larger context window, Claude Opus 5.5 or Gemini 3.7 Flash?

Gemini 3.7 Flash supports up to 1M tokens, compared with 1M for the other.

Which is better for coding, Claude Opus 5.5 or Gemini 3.7 Flash?

Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, Claude Opus 5.5 ranks higher — 100th vs 91th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.