← All models
Compare

Claude Opus 5.5 vs Kimi K3

Claude Opus 5.5 (Anthropic) and Kimi K3 (Moonshot) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeClaude Opus 5.5Anthropic · 16 in the newsKimi K3Moonshot · 50 in the news
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)169159
Coding10094
Math8560
Reasoning & Knowledge9364
Agentic & Tools9553
Specifications
DeveloperAnthropicMoonshot
FamilyClaudeKimi
ReleasedSep 22, 2026Jul 16, 2026
Parameters—2.8T
AvailabilityAPI accessOpen weights (non-commercial)
Context window1M1M
Price — $/M input$4.00$0.28
Price — $/M output$20.00$9.94
Inputstext, image, filetext, image, video
Outputstexttext
Benchmarks
AIME 2024/2025100%97%
APEX74%48%
ARC-AGI99%95%
ARC-AGI-293%60%
GPQA Diamond94%93%
Humanity's Last Exam61%47%
SciCode67%60%
SimpleBench88%61%
SimpleQA Verified72%51%
WebDev Arena18201674
WeirdML—83%

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Opus 5.5 better than Kimi K3?

On Epoch AI's Capabilities Index, Claude Opus 5.5 scores higher (169) than Kimi K3 (159). The right pick depends on your task, so compare their coding, math, and reasoning scores in the table above.

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 5.5 or Kimi K3?

Kimi K3 is cheaper on input tokens at $0.28 per million, versus $4.00 (representative OpenRouter pricing).

Which has a larger context window, Claude Opus 5.5 or Kimi K3?

Neither: both support up to 1M tokens.

Which is better for coding, Claude Opus 5.5 or Kimi K3?

Claude Opus 5.5 ranks higher across coding benchmarks like WebDev Arena and SciCode: 100th vs 94th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.