← All models
Compare

Gemini 3.8 Flash vs GPT-6 Astra

Gemini 3.8 Flash (Google DeepMind) and GPT-6 Astra (OpenAI) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeGemini 3.8 FlashGoogle DeepMind · 2 in the newsGPT-6 AstraOpenAI · 18 in the news
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)169
Coding8795
Math9096
Reasoning & Knowledge9599
Agentic & Tools96
Specifications
DeveloperGoogle DeepMindOpenAI
FamilyGeminiGPT
ReleasedSep 2, 2026Sep 3, 2026
Parameters
AvailabilityAPI accessAPI access
Context window1M1.1M
Price — $/M input$0.75$10.00
Price — $/M output$3.75$50.00
Inputstext, image, video, file, audiofile, image, text
Outputstexttext
Benchmarks
AIME 2024/202599%100%
GPQA Diamond95%96%
Humanity's Last Exam48%55%
SciCode57%56%
SimpleQA Verified70%76%
WebDev Arena15671797
APEX47%
ARC-AGI99%
ARC-AGI-295%
WeirdML93%

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.8 Flash or GPT-6 Astra?

Gemini 3.8 Flash is cheaper on input tokens at $0.75 per million, versus $10.00 (representative OpenRouter pricing).

Which has a larger context window, Gemini 3.8 Flash or GPT-6 Astra?

GPT-6 Astra supports up to 1.1M tokens, compared with 1M for the other.

Which is better for coding, Gemini 3.8 Flash or GPT-6 Astra?

Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, GPT-6 Astra ranks higher — 95th vs 87th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.