← All models
Compare

Claude Opus 5.5 vs Qwen3.7-Max

Claude Opus 5.5 (Anthropic) and Qwen3.7-Max (Alibaba) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeClaude Opus 5.5Anthropic · 10 in the newsQwen3.7-MaxAlibaba · 4 in the news
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)167154
Coding10062
Math8858
Reasoning & Knowledge9072
Agentic & Tools9778
Specifications
DeveloperAnthropicAlibaba
FamilyClaudeQwen
ReleasedSep 22, 2026May 19, 2026
Parameters——
AvailabilityAPI accessAPI access
Context window1M1M
Price — $/M input$4.00$1.48
Price — $/M output$20.00$4.42
Inputstext, image, filetext
Outputstexttext
Benchmarks
AIME 2024/2025100%96%
APEX74%—
ARC-AGI99%—
ARC-AGI-293%—
GPQA Diamond91%91%
Humanity's Last Exam61%41%
SciCode67%50%
SimpleQA Verified72%56%
WebDev Arena18201517
SimpleBench—70%
SWE-bench Verified—77%
τ²-bench—95%

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Opus 5.5 better than Qwen3.7-Max?

On Epoch AI's Capabilities Index, Claude Opus 5.5 scores higher (167) than Qwen3.7-Max (154). The right pick depends on your task, so compare their coding, math, and reasoning scores in the table above.

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 5.5 or Qwen3.7-Max?

Qwen3.7-Max is cheaper on input tokens at $1.48 per million, versus $4.00 (representative OpenRouter pricing).

Which has a larger context window, Claude Opus 5.5 or Qwen3.7-Max?

Neither: both support up to 1M tokens.

Which is better for coding, Claude Opus 5.5 or Qwen3.7-Max?

Claude Opus 5.5 ranks higher across coding benchmarks like WebDev Arena and SciCode: 100th vs 62nd percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.