← All models
Compare

Claude Opus 5.5 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash

Claude Opus 5.5 (Anthropic) and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (DeepSeek) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeClaude Opus 5.5Anthropic · 10 in the newsDeepSeek V4.1 FlashDeepSeek · 10 in the news
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)167156
Coding10075
Math8874
Reasoning & Knowledge9061
Agentic & Tools9747
Specifications
DeveloperAnthropicDeepSeek
FamilyClaudeDeepSeek
ReleasedSep 22, 2026Sep 9, 2026
Parameters—748B
AvailabilityAPI accessOpen weights (unrestricted)
Context window1M1M
Price — $/M input$4.00$0.14
Price — $/M output$20.00$0.54
Inputstext, image, filetext, image
Outputstexttext
Benchmarks
AIME 2024/2025100%98%
APEX74%40%
ARC-AGI99%95%
ARC-AGI-293%73%
GPQA Diamond91%90%
Humanity's Last Exam61%39%
SciCode67%52%
SimpleQA Verified72%43%
WebDev Arena18201614

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Opus 5.5 better than DeepSeek V4.1 Flash?

On Epoch AI's Capabilities Index, Claude Opus 5.5 scores higher (167) than DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (156). The right pick depends on your task, so compare their coding, math, and reasoning scores in the table above.

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 5.5 or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is cheaper on input tokens at $0.14 per million, versus $4.00 (representative OpenRouter pricing).

Which has a larger context window, Claude Opus 5.5 or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash?

Neither: both support up to 1M tokens.

Which is better for coding, Claude Opus 5.5 or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash?

Claude Opus 5.5 ranks higher across coding benchmarks like WebDev Arena and SciCode: 100th vs 75th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.