← All models
Compare

Claude Opus 5.5 vs GLM-5.3-Flash

Claude Opus 5.5 (Anthropic) and GLM-5.3-Flash (Z.ai (Zhipu AI)) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeClaude Opus 5.5Anthropic · 10 in the newsGLM-5.3-FlashZ.ai (Zhipu AI) · 6 in the news
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)167153
Coding10075
Math8852
Reasoning & Knowledge9052
Agentic & Tools9769
Specifications
DeveloperAnthropicZ.ai (Zhipu AI)
FamilyClaude—
ReleasedSep 22, 2026Aug 20, 2026
Parameters—320B
AvailabilityAPI accessOpen weights (unrestricted)
Context window1M1M
Price — $/M input$4.00$0.13
Price — $/M output$20.00$0.44
Inputstext, image, filetext, image, video
Outputstexttext
Benchmarks
AIME 2024/2025100%94%
APEX74%53%
ARC-AGI99%91%
ARC-AGI-293%66%
GPQA Diamond91%90%
Humanity's Last Exam61%40%
SciCode67%52%
SimpleQA Verified72%32%
WebDev Arena18201607

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Opus 5.5 better than GLM-5.3-Flash?

On Epoch AI's Capabilities Index, Claude Opus 5.5 scores higher (167) than GLM-5.3-Flash (153). The right pick depends on your task, so compare their coding, math, and reasoning scores in the table above.

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 5.5 or GLM-5.3-Flash?

GLM-5.3-Flash is cheaper on input tokens at $0.13 per million, versus $4.00 (representative OpenRouter pricing).

Which has a larger context window, Claude Opus 5.5 or GLM-5.3-Flash?

Neither: both support up to 1M tokens.

Which is better for coding, Claude Opus 5.5 or GLM-5.3-Flash?

Claude Opus 5.5 ranks higher across coding benchmarks like WebDev Arena and SciCode: 100th vs 75th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.