Qwen 3.7 Max vs Step 3.7 Flash
Qwen 3.7 Max (Alibaba) and Step 3.7 Flash (StepFun) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.
- Step 3.7 Flash is cheaper on input tokens — $0.20 vs $1.25 per 1M.
- Qwen 3.7 Max has a larger context window (1M vs 256K tokens).
- Qwen 3.7 Max ranks higher for coding (81th vs 32th percentile).
Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, Qwen 3.7 Max or Step 3.7 Flash?
Step 3.7 Flash is cheaper on input tokens at $0.20 per million, versus $1.25 (representative OpenRouter pricing).
Which has a larger context window, Qwen 3.7 Max or Step 3.7 Flash?
Qwen 3.7 Max supports up to 1M tokens, compared with 256K for the other.
Which is better for coding, Qwen 3.7 Max or Step 3.7 Flash?
Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, Qwen 3.7 Max ranks higher — 81th vs 32th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.
Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.
More comparisons
Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.