Claude Fable 5 vs GLM-5.2
Claude Fable 5 (Anthropic) and GLM-5.2 (Z.ai (Zhipu AI)) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.
- Claude Fable 5 leads on overall intelligence (ECI 163 vs 152).
- GLM-5.2 is cheaper on input tokens — $0.97 vs $10.00 per 1M.
- GLM-5.2 has a larger context window (1M vs 1M tokens).
- Claude Fable 5 ranks higher for coding (91th vs 76th percentile).
| Attribute | Claude Fable 5 | GLM-5.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Scores | ||
| Intelligence (ECI) | 163 | 152 |
| Coding | 91 | 76 |
| Math | 91 | 27 |
| Reasoning & Knowledge | 86 | 48 |
| Agentic & Tools | 92 | 78 |
| Specifications | ||
| Developer | Anthropic | Z.ai (Zhipu AI) |
| Family | Claude | — |
| Released | Jun 9, 2026 | Jun 16, 2026 |
| Parameters | — | — |
| Availability | API access | Open weights (unrestricted) |
| Context window | 1M | 1M |
| Price — $/M input | $10.00 | $0.97 |
| Price — $/M output | $50.00 | $4.00 |
| Inputs | text, image, file | text |
| Outputs | text | text |
| Benchmarks | ||
| AIME 2024/2025 | 100% | 86% |
| APEX | 64% | 45% |
| ARC-AGI | 99% | 77% |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 89% | 23% |
| GPQA Diamond | 86% | 92% |
| GSO (code optimization) | 78% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 56% | 41% |
| SciCode | 61% | 51% |
| SimpleBench | 82% | 59% |
| SimpleQA Verified | 71% | 34% |
| WebDev Arena | 1628 | 1593 |
| WeirdML | 92% | 70% |
| τ²-bench | 99% | 99% |
| SWE-bench Verified | — | 79% |
Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude Fable 5 better than GLM-5.2?
On Epoch AI's Capabilities Index, Claude Fable 5 scores higher (163) than GLM-5.2 (152). The right pick depends on your task — compare their coding, math, and reasoning scores in the table above.
Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5 or GLM-5.2?
GLM-5.2 is cheaper on input tokens at $0.97 per million, versus $10.00 (representative OpenRouter pricing).
Which has a larger context window, Claude Fable 5 or GLM-5.2?
GLM-5.2 supports up to 1M tokens, compared with 1M for the other.
Which is better for coding, Claude Fable 5 or GLM-5.2?
Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, Claude Fable 5 ranks higher — 91th vs 76th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.
Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.
More comparisons
Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.