← All models
Compare

Claude Fable 5 vs Qwen 3.7 Max

Claude Fable 5 (Anthropic) and Qwen 3.7 Max (Alibaba) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeClaude Fable 5Anthropic · 47 in the newsQwen 3.7 MaxAlibaba · 4 in the news
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)162154
Coding9873
Math9771
Reasoning & Knowledge9079
Agentic & Tools9879
Specifications
DeveloperAnthropicAlibaba
FamilyClaudeQwen
ReleasedJun 9, 2026May 19, 2026
Parameters
AvailabilityAPI access
Context window1M1M
Price — $/M input$10.00$1.48
Price — $/M output$50.00$4.42
Inputstext, image, filetext
Outputstexttext
Benchmarks
AIME 2024/2025100%96%
APEX45%
ARC-AGI99%
ARC-AGI-289%
GPQA Diamond86%91%
Humanity's Last Exam56%41%
SciCode60%49%
SimpleBench82%70%
SimpleQA Verified68%59%
WebDev Arena16541541
WeirdML92%
τ²-bench99%95%
SWE-bench Verified77%

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Fable 5 better than Qwen 3.7 Max?

On Epoch AI's Capabilities Index, Claude Fable 5 scores higher (162) than Qwen 3.7 Max (154). The right pick depends on your task — compare their coding, math, and reasoning scores in the table above.

Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5 or Qwen 3.7 Max?

Qwen 3.7 Max is cheaper on input tokens at $1.48 per million, versus $10.00 (representative OpenRouter pricing).

Which has a larger context window, Claude Fable 5 or Qwen 3.7 Max?

Claude Fable 5 supports up to 1M tokens, compared with 1M for the other.

Which is better for coding, Claude Fable 5 or Qwen 3.7 Max?

Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, Claude Fable 5 ranks higher — 98th vs 73th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.