← All models
Compare

Claude Fable 5 vs Muse Spark

Claude Fable 5 (Anthropic) and Muse Spark (Meta AI) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

Claude Fable 5Anthropic · 18 in the newsMuse SparkMeta AI
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)161155
Coding10084
Math9769
Reasoning & Knowledge9786
Agentic & Tools9762
Specifications
DeveloperAnthropicMeta AI
FamilyClaude
ReleasedJun 9, 2026Apr 8, 2026
Parameters
AvailabilityAPI accessAPI access
Context window1M
Price — $/M input$10.00
Price — $/M output$50.00
Inputstext, image, file
Outputstext
Benchmarks
AIME 2024/2025100%89%
APEX45%
GPQA Diamond93%90%
Humanity's Last Exam53%41%
SciCode60%52%
SimpleBench82%
SimpleQA Verified68%66%
WebDev Arena16541513
WeirdML88%
τ²-bench99%92%
FrontierMath39%
FrontierMath Tier 415%

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Fable 5 better than Muse Spark?

On Epoch AI's Capabilities Index, Claude Fable 5 scores higher (161) than Muse Spark (155). The right pick depends on your task — compare their coding, math, and reasoning scores in the table above.

Which is better for coding, Claude Fable 5 or Muse Spark?

Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, Claude Fable 5 ranks higher — 100th vs 84th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.