← All models
Compare

Claude Fable 5 vs Muse Spark

Claude Fable 5 (Anthropic) and Muse Spark (Meta AI) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeClaude Fable 5Anthropic · 52 in the newsMuse SparkMeta AI · 3 in the news
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)163152
Coding9163
Math9158
Reasoning & Knowledge8674
Agentic & Tools9257
Specifications
DeveloperAnthropicMeta AI
FamilyClaude—
ReleasedJun 9, 2026Apr 8, 2026
Parameters——
AvailabilityAPI accessAPI access
Context window1M—
Price — $/M input$10.00—
Price — $/M output$50.00—
Inputstext, image, file—
Outputstext—
Benchmarks
AIME 2024/2025100%89%
APEX64%—
ARC-AGI99%—
ARC-AGI-289%—
GPQA Diamond86%90%
GSO (code optimization)78%—
Humanity's Last Exam56%41%
SciCode61%52%
SimpleBench82%—
SimpleQA Verified71%66%
WebDev Arena16281513
WeirdML92%—
τ²-bench99%92%
FrontierMath—39%
FrontierMath Tier 4—15%

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Fable 5 better than Muse Spark?

On Epoch AI's Capabilities Index, Claude Fable 5 scores higher (163) than Muse Spark (152). The right pick depends on your task — compare their coding, math, and reasoning scores in the table above.

Which is better for coding, Claude Fable 5 or Muse Spark?

Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, Claude Fable 5 ranks higher — 91th vs 63th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.