Compare
Muse Spark vs Ring-2.6-1T
Muse Spark (Meta AI) and Ring-2.6-1T (inclusionAI) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.
- Muse Spark ranks higher for coding (84th vs 47th percentile).
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)155—
Coding8447
Math69—
Reasoning & Knowledge8643
Agentic & Tools6266
Specifications
DeveloperMeta AIinclusionAI
Family——
ReleasedApr 8, 2026May 8, 2026
Parameters——
AvailabilityAPI access—
Context window—262K
Price — $/M input—$0.07
Price — $/M output—$0.63
Inputs—text
Outputs—text
Benchmarks
AIME 2024/202589%—
FrontierMath39%—
FrontierMath Tier 415%—
GPQA Diamond90%86%
Humanity's Last Exam41%18%
SciCode52%42%
SimpleQA Verified66%—
WebDev Arena1513—
τ²-bench92%92%
Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better for coding, Muse Spark or Ring-2.6-1T?
Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, Muse Spark ranks higher — 84th vs 47th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.
Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.
More comparisons
Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.