← All models
Compare

Muse Spark 1.1 vs Qwen 3.7 Max

Muse Spark 1.1 (Meta AI) and Qwen 3.7 Max (Alibaba) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeMuse Spark 1.1Meta AIQwen 3.7 MaxAlibaba · 4 in the news
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)153
Coding9979
Math74
Reasoning & Knowledge8583
Agentic & Tools78
Specifications
DeveloperMeta AIAlibaba
FamilyQwen
ReleasedJul 9, 2026May 19, 2026
Parameters
AvailabilityAPI access
Context window1M
Price — $/M input$1.25
Price — $/M output$3.75
Inputstext
Outputstext
Benchmarks
GPQA Diamond90%92%
Humanity's Last Exam45%38%
SciCode58%49%
AIME 2024/202595%
SimpleBench70%
SimpleQA Verified59%
SWE-bench Verified77%
WebDev Arena1541
τ²-bench95%

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Which is better for coding, Muse Spark 1.1 or Qwen 3.7 Max?

Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, Muse Spark 1.1 ranks higher — 99th vs 79th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.