← All models
Compare

GPT-5.6 Luna vs Qwen 3.7 Max

GPT-5.6 Luna (OpenAI) and Qwen 3.7 Max (Alibaba) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeGPT-5.6 LunaOpenAIQwen 3.7 MaxAlibaba · 4 in the news
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)153
Coding8479
Math78
Reasoning & Knowledge8383
Agentic & Tools78
Specifications
DeveloperOpenAIAlibaba
FamilyGPTQwen
ReleasedJul 9, 2026May 19, 2026
Parameters
Availability
Context window1.1M1M
Price — $/M input$1.00$1.25
Price — $/M output$6.00$3.75
Inputsfile, image, texttext
Outputstexttext
Benchmarks
GPQA Diamond91%92%
Humanity's Last Exam37%38%
SciCode53%49%
AIME 2024/202595%
SimpleBench70%
SimpleQA Verified59%
SWE-bench Verified77%
WebDev Arena1541
τ²-bench95%

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, GPT-5.6 Luna or Qwen 3.7 Max?

GPT-5.6 Luna is cheaper on input tokens at $1.00 per million, versus $1.25 (representative OpenRouter pricing).

Which has a larger context window, GPT-5.6 Luna or Qwen 3.7 Max?

GPT-5.6 Luna supports up to 1.1M tokens, compared with 1M for the other.

Which is better for coding, GPT-5.6 Luna or Qwen 3.7 Max?

Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, GPT-5.6 Luna ranks higher — 84th vs 79th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.