← All models
Compare

GLM-5.2 vs Muse Spark

GLM-5.2 (Z.ai (Zhipu AI)) and Muse Spark (Meta AI) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

GLM-5.2Z.ai (Zhipu AI) · 7 in the newsMuse SparkMeta AI
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)153155
Coding8884
Math4169
Reasoning & Knowledge7786
Agentic & Tools10062
Specifications
DeveloperZ.ai (Zhipu AI)Meta AI
Family
ReleasedJun 16, 2026Apr 8, 2026
Parameters
AvailabilityOpen weights (unrestricted)API access
Context window1M
Price — $/M input$0.93
Price — $/M output$3.00
Inputstext
Outputstext
Benchmarks
AIME 2024/202586%89%
GPQA Diamond92%90%
Humanity's Last Exam40%41%
SciCode51%52%
SimpleQA Verified38%66%
SWE-bench Verified79%
WebDev Arena15931513
WeirdML70%
τ²-bench99%92%
FrontierMath39%
FrontierMath Tier 415%

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Is GLM-5.2 better than Muse Spark?

On Epoch AI's Capabilities Index, Muse Spark scores higher (155) than GLM-5.2 (153). The right pick depends on your task — compare their coding, math, and reasoning scores in the table above.

Which is better for coding, GLM-5.2 or Muse Spark?

Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, GLM-5.2 ranks higher — 88th vs 84th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.