Compare

Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Ring-2.6-1T

Gemini 3.1 Pro (Google DeepMind) and Ring-2.6-1T (inclusionAI) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

Gemini 3.1 Pro ranks higher for coding (68th vs 47th percentile).

Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle DeepMind · 3 in the newsRing-2.6-1TinclusionAI

Scores

Intelligence (ECI)155—

Coding6847

Math77—

Reasoning & Knowledge9643

Agentic & Tools8866

Specifications

DeveloperGoogle DeepMindinclusionAI

FamilyGemini—

ReleasedFeb 19, 2026May 8, 2026

Parameters——

AvailabilityAPI access—

Context window—262K

Price — $/M input—$0.07

Price — $/M output—$0.63

Inputs—text

Outputs—text

Benchmarks

AIME 2024/202596%—

APEX34%—

ARC-AGI98%—

ARC-AGI-277%—

FrontierMath37%—

FrontierMath Tier 417%—

GPQA Diamond94%86%

GSO (code optimization)23%—

Humanity's Last Exam46%18%

METR task horizon6.4 h—

SimpleBench80%—

SimpleQA Verified77%—

SWE-bench Verified76%—

Terminal-Bench80%—

WebDev Arena1461—

WeirdML72%—

SciCode—42%

τ²-bench—92%

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Which is better for coding, Gemini 3.1 Pro or Ring-2.6-1T?

Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, Gemini 3.1 Pro ranks higher — 68th vs 47th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

More comparisons

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.