← All models
Compare

Claude Fable 5 vs Grok 4.6

Claude Fable 5 (Anthropic) and Grok 4.6 (xAI) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeClaude Fable 5Anthropic · 47 in the newsGrok 4.6xAI · 1 in the news
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)162156
Coding9891
Math9793
Reasoning & Knowledge9076
Agentic & Tools9889
Specifications
DeveloperAnthropicxAI
FamilyClaudeGrok
ReleasedJun 9, 2026Aug 12, 2026
Parameters
AvailabilityAPI accessAPI access
Context window1M500K
Price — $/M input$10.00$2.00
Price — $/M output$50.00$6.00
Inputstext, image, filetext, image, file
Outputstexttext
Benchmarks
AIME 2024/2025100%99%
APEX45%41%
ARC-AGI99%88%
ARC-AGI-289%67%
GPQA Diamond86%94%
Humanity's Last Exam56%43%
SciCode60%54%
SimpleBench82%
SimpleQA Verified68%54%
WebDev Arena16541631
WeirdML92%67%
τ²-bench99%

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Fable 5 better than Grok 4.6?

On Epoch AI's Capabilities Index, Claude Fable 5 scores higher (162) than Grok 4.6 (156). The right pick depends on your task — compare their coding, math, and reasoning scores in the table above.

Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5 or Grok 4.6?

Grok 4.6 is cheaper on input tokens at $2.00 per million, versus $10.00 (representative OpenRouter pricing).

Which has a larger context window, Claude Fable 5 or Grok 4.6?

Claude Fable 5 supports up to 1M tokens, compared with 500K for the other.

Which is better for coding, Claude Fable 5 or Grok 4.6?

Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, Claude Fable 5 ranks higher — 98th vs 91th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.