← All models
Compare

Claude Fable 5 vs Kimi K3

Claude Fable 5 (Anthropic) and Kimi K3 (Moonshot) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeClaude Fable 5Anthropic · 51 in the newsKimi K3Moonshot · 39 in the news
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)163158
Coding9697
Math9681
Reasoning & Knowledge8973
Agentic & Tools9680
Specifications
DeveloperAnthropicMoonshot
FamilyClaudeKimi
ReleasedJun 9, 2026Jul 16, 2026
Parameters2.8T
AvailabilityAPI accessOpen weights (non-commercial)
Context window1M1M
Price — $/M input$10.00$2.55
Price — $/M output$50.00$12.75
Inputstext, image, filetext, image, video
Outputstexttext
Benchmarks
AIME 2024/2025100%97%
APEX45%39%
ARC-AGI99%95%
ARC-AGI-289%60%
GPQA Diamond86%93%
Humanity's Last Exam56%47%
SciCode61%60%
SimpleBench82%61%
SimpleQA Verified71%51%
WebDev Arena16261674
WeirdML92%83%
τ²-bench99%

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Fable 5 better than Kimi K3?

On Epoch AI's Capabilities Index, Claude Fable 5 scores higher (163) than Kimi K3 (158). The right pick depends on your task — compare their coding, math, and reasoning scores in the table above.

Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5 or Kimi K3?

Kimi K3 is cheaper on input tokens at $2.55 per million, versus $10.00 (representative OpenRouter pricing).

Which has a larger context window, Claude Fable 5 or Kimi K3?

Kimi K3 supports up to 1M tokens, compared with 1M for the other.

Which is better for coding, Claude Fable 5 or Kimi K3?

Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, Kimi K3 ranks higher — 97th vs 96th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.