Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Qwen 3.7 Max
Gemini 3.1 Pro (Google DeepMind) and Qwen 3.7 Max (Alibaba) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.
- Gemini 3.1 Pro leads on overall intelligence (ECI 155 vs 153).
- Qwen 3.7 Max ranks higher for coding (81th vs 68th percentile).
Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 3.1 Pro better than Qwen 3.7 Max?
On Epoch AI's Capabilities Index, Gemini 3.1 Pro scores higher (155) than Qwen 3.7 Max (153). The right pick depends on your task — compare their coding, math, and reasoning scores in the table above.
Which is better for coding, Gemini 3.1 Pro or Qwen 3.7 Max?
Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, Qwen 3.7 Max ranks higher — 81th vs 68th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.
Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.
More comparisons
Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.