← All models
Compare

Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Grok 4.6

Gemini 3.1 Pro (Google DeepMind) and Grok 4.6 (xAI) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeGemini 3.1 ProGoogle DeepMind · 3 in the newsGrok 4.6xAI · 1 in the news
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)155156
Coding5991
Math7193
Reasoning & Knowledge9376
Agentic & Tools7989
Specifications
DeveloperGoogle DeepMindxAI
FamilyGeminiGrok
ReleasedFeb 19, 2026Aug 12, 2026
Parameters
AvailabilityAPI accessAPI access
Context window500K
Price — $/M input$2.00
Price — $/M output$6.00
Inputstext, image, file
Outputstext
Benchmarks
AIME 2024/202596%99%
APEX34%41%
ARC-AGI98%88%
ARC-AGI-277%67%
FrontierMath37%
FrontierMath Tier 417%
GPQA Diamond94%94%
GSO (code optimization)23%
Humanity's Last Exam46%43%
METR task horizon6.4 h
SimpleBench80%
SimpleQA Verified77%54%
SWE-bench Verified76%
Terminal-Bench80%
WebDev Arena14611631
WeirdML72%67%
SciCode54%

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 3.1 Pro better than Grok 4.6?

On Epoch AI's Capabilities Index, Grok 4.6 scores higher (156) than Gemini 3.1 Pro (155). The right pick depends on your task — compare their coding, math, and reasoning scores in the table above.

Which is better for coding, Gemini 3.1 Pro or Grok 4.6?

Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, Grok 4.6 ranks higher — 91th vs 59th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.