Compare
Fugu Ultra vs Qwen 3.7 Max
Fugu Ultra (Sakana) and Qwen 3.7 Max (Alibaba) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.
- Qwen 3.7 Max is cheaper on input tokens — $1.25 vs $5.00 per 1M.
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)—153
Coding—81
Math—78
Reasoning & Knowledge—85
Agentic & Tools—78
Specifications
DeveloperSakanaAlibaba
Family—Qwen
ReleasedJun 24, 2026May 19, 2026
Parameters——
Availability——
Context window1M1M
Price — $/M input$5.00$1.25
Price — $/M output$30.00$3.75
Inputstext, imagetext
Outputstexttext
Benchmarks
AIME 2024/2025—95%
GPQA Diamond—92%
Humanity's Last Exam—38%
SciCode—49%
SimpleBench—70%
SimpleQA Verified—59%
SWE-bench Verified—77%
WebDev Arena—1541
τ²-bench—95%
Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, Fugu Ultra or Qwen 3.7 Max?
Qwen 3.7 Max is cheaper on input tokens at $1.25 per million, versus $5.00 (representative OpenRouter pricing).
Which has a larger context window, Fugu Ultra or Qwen 3.7 Max?
Fugu Ultra supports up to 1M tokens, compared with 1M for the other.
Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.
More comparisons
Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.