Compare
EXAONE 4.0 (32B) vs Grok 4.6
EXAONE 4.0 (32B) (LG AI Research) and Grok 4.6 (xAI) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.
- Grok 4.6 ranks higher for coding (91th vs 24th percentile).
| Attribute | EXAONE 4.0 (32B) | Grok 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Scores | ||
| Intelligence (ECI) | — | 156 |
| Coding | 24 | 91 |
| Math | 18 | 93 |
| Reasoning & Knowledge | 15 | 76 |
| Agentic & Tools | 0 | 89 |
| Specifications | ||
| Developer | LG AI Research | xAI |
| Family | — | Grok |
| Released | Jul 15, 2025 | Aug 12, 2026 |
| Parameters | 32B | — |
| Availability | Open weights (non-commercial) | API access |
| Context window | — | 500K |
| Price — $/M input | — | $2.00 |
| Price — $/M output | — | $6.00 |
| Inputs | — | text, image, file |
| Outputs | — | text |
| Benchmarks | ||
| AIME 2024/2025 | 80% | 99% |
| GPQA Diamond | 74% | 94% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 11% | 43% |
| LiveCodeBench | 75% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 82% | — |
| SciCode | 34% | 54% |
| τ²-bench | 17% | — |
| APEX | — | 41% |
| ARC-AGI | — | 88% |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 67% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 54% |
| WebDev Arena | — | 1631 |
| WeirdML | — | 67% |
Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better for coding, EXAONE 4.0 (32B) or Grok 4.6?
Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, Grok 4.6 ranks higher — 91th vs 24th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.
Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.
More comparisons
Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.