← All models
Compare

EXAONE 4.0 (32B) vs Gemini 3.1 Pro

EXAONE 4.0 (32B) (LG AI Research) and Gemini 3.1 Pro (Google DeepMind) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeEXAONE 4.0 (32B)LG AI ResearchGemini 3.1 ProGoogle DeepMind · 3 in the news
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)155
Coding2459
Math1871
Reasoning & Knowledge1593
Agentic & Tools079
Specifications
DeveloperLG AI ResearchGoogle DeepMind
FamilyGemini
ReleasedJul 15, 2025Feb 19, 2026
Parameters32B
AvailabilityOpen weights (non-commercial)API access
Context window
Price — $/M input
Price — $/M output
Inputs
Outputs
Benchmarks
AIME 2024/202580%96%
GPQA Diamond74%94%
Humanity's Last Exam11%46%
LiveCodeBench75%
MMLU-Pro82%
SciCode34%
τ²-bench17%
APEX34%
ARC-AGI98%
ARC-AGI-277%
FrontierMath37%
FrontierMath Tier 417%
GSO (code optimization)23%
METR task horizon6.4 h
SimpleBench80%
SimpleQA Verified77%
SWE-bench Verified76%
Terminal-Bench80%
WebDev Arena1461
WeirdML72%

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Which is better for coding, EXAONE 4.0 (32B) or Gemini 3.1 Pro?

Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, Gemini 3.1 Pro ranks higher — 59th vs 24th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.