← All models
Compare

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs Grok 4.6

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (DeepSeek) and Grok 4.6 (xAI) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeDeepSeek V4 Flash 0731DeepSeek · 3 in the newsGrok 4.6xAI · 1 in the news
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)154156
Coding7991
Math6893
Reasoning & Knowledge6376
Agentic & Tools89
Specifications
DeveloperDeepSeekxAI
FamilyDeepSeekGrok
ReleasedJul 31, 2026Aug 12, 2026
Parameters
AvailabilityOpen weights (unrestricted)API access
Context window1.3M500K
Price — $/M input$0.08$2.00
Price — $/M output$0.18$6.00
Inputstexttext, image, file
Outputstexttext
Benchmarks
AIME 2024/202594%99%
ARC-AGI89%88%
ARC-AGI-261%67%
GPQA Diamond91%94%
Humanity's Last Exam39%43%
SciCode50%54%
SimpleQA Verified35%54%
WebDev Arena15771631
WeirdML63%67%
APEX41%

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 better than Grok 4.6?

On Epoch AI's Capabilities Index, Grok 4.6 scores higher (156) than DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (154). The right pick depends on your task — compare their coding, math, and reasoning scores in the table above.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 or Grok 4.6?

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 is cheaper on input tokens at $0.08 per million, versus $2.00 (representative OpenRouter pricing).

Which has a larger context window, DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 or Grok 4.6?

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 supports up to 1.3M tokens, compared with 500K for the other.

Which is better for coding, DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 or Grok 4.6?

Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, Grok 4.6 ranks higher — 91th vs 79th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.