← All models
Compare

Claude Fable 5 vs Grok 4

Claude Fable 5 (Anthropic) and Grok 4 (xAI) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeClaude Fable 5Anthropic · 48 in the newsGrok 4xAI
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)162147
Coding9843
Math9723
Reasoning & Knowledge9047
Agentic & Tools9815
Specifications
DeveloperAnthropicxAI
FamilyClaudeGrok
ReleasedJun 9, 2026Jul 9, 2025
Parameters3T
AvailabilityAPI accessAPI access
Context window1M
Price — $/M input$10.00
Price — $/M output$50.00
Inputstext, image, file
Outputstext
Benchmarks
AIME 2024/2025100%84%
APEX45%15%
ARC-AGI99%67%
ARC-AGI-289%16%
GPQA Diamond86%87%
Humanity's Last Exam56%27%
SciCode60%46%
SimpleBench82%61%
SimpleQA Verified68%48%
WebDev Arena1654
WeirdML92%46%
τ²-bench99%75%
FrontierMath20%
FrontierMath Tier 42%
GDPval (win/tie rate)24%
LiveCodeBench82%
METR task horizon1.8 h
MMLU-Pro87%
Terminal-Bench27%

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Fable 5 better than Grok 4?

On Epoch AI's Capabilities Index, Claude Fable 5 scores higher (162) than Grok 4 (147). The right pick depends on your task — compare their coding, math, and reasoning scores in the table above.

Which is better for coding, Claude Fable 5 or Grok 4?

Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, Claude Fable 5 ranks higher — 98th vs 43th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.