Compare
Claude Fable 5 vs EXAONE 4.0 (32B)
Claude Fable 5 (Anthropic) and EXAONE 4.0 (32B) (LG AI Research) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.
- Claude Fable 5 ranks higher for coding (98th vs 24th percentile).
| Attribute | Claude Fable 5 | EXAONE 4.0 (32B) |
|---|---|---|
| Scores | ||
| Intelligence (ECI) | 162 | — |
| Coding | 98 | 24 |
| Math | 97 | 18 |
| Reasoning & Knowledge | 90 | 15 |
| Agentic & Tools | 98 | 0 |
| Specifications | ||
| Developer | Anthropic | LG AI Research |
| Family | Claude | — |
| Released | Jun 9, 2026 | Jul 15, 2025 |
| Parameters | — | 32B |
| Availability | API access | Open weights (non-commercial) |
| Context window | 1M | — |
| Price — $/M input | $10.00 | — |
| Price — $/M output | $50.00 | — |
| Inputs | text, image, file | — |
| Outputs | text | — |
| Benchmarks | ||
| AIME 2024/2025 | 100% | 80% |
| APEX | 45% | — |
| ARC-AGI | 99% | — |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 89% | — |
| GPQA Diamond | 86% | 74% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 56% | 11% |
| SciCode | 60% | 34% |
| SimpleBench | 82% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 68% | — |
| WebDev Arena | 1654 | — |
| WeirdML | 92% | — |
| τ²-bench | 99% | 17% |
| LiveCodeBench | — | 75% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 82% |
Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better for coding, Claude Fable 5 or EXAONE 4.0 (32B)?
Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, Claude Fable 5 ranks higher — 98th vs 24th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.
Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.
More comparisons
Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.