← All models
Compare

Muse Spark vs Trinity Large Thinking

Muse Spark (Meta AI) and Trinity Large Thinking (Arcee AI) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeMuse SparkMeta AI · 1 in the newsTrinity Large ThinkingArcee AI
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)154
Coding7912
Math66
Reasoning & Knowledge8425
Agentic & Tools6460
Specifications
DeveloperMeta AIArcee AI
Family
ReleasedApr 8, 2026Apr 1, 2026
Parameters
AvailabilityAPI access
Context window262K
Price — $/M input$0.25
Price — $/M output$0.80
Inputstext
Outputstext
Benchmarks
AIME 2024/202589%
FrontierMath39%
FrontierMath Tier 415%
GPQA Diamond90%75%
Humanity's Last Exam41%15%
SciCode52%36%
SimpleQA Verified66%
WebDev Arena15131239
τ²-bench92%90%

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Which is better for coding, Muse Spark or Trinity Large Thinking?

Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, Muse Spark ranks higher — 79th vs 12th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.