← All models
Compare

Muse Spark vs Qwen3-Coder-480B-A35B

Muse Spark (Meta AI) and Qwen3-Coder-480B-A35B (Alibaba) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeMuse SparkMeta AI · 1 in the newsQwen3-Coder-480B-A35BAlibaba
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)154
Coding7911
Math66
Reasoning & Knowledge8421
Agentic & Tools6418
Specifications
DeveloperMeta AIAlibaba
FamilyQwen
ReleasedApr 8, 2026Jul 31, 2025
Parameters480B
AvailabilityAPI accessOpen weights (unrestricted)
Context window
Price — $/M input
Price — $/M output
Inputs
Outputs
Benchmarks
AIME 2024/202589%
FrontierMath39%
FrontierMath Tier 415%
GPQA Diamond90%
Humanity's Last Exam41%
SciCode52%
SimpleQA Verified66%
WebDev Arena15131285
τ²-bench92%
GSO (code optimization)5%
Terminal-Bench27%
WeirdML41%

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Which is better for coding, Muse Spark or Qwen3-Coder-480B-A35B?

Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, Muse Spark ranks higher — 79th vs 11th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.