← All models
Compare

Muse Spark vs Qwen 3.6 Max (Preview)

Muse Spark (Meta AI) and Qwen 3.6 Max (Preview) (Alibaba) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeMuse SparkMeta AI · 1 in the newsQwen 3.6 Max (Preview)Alibaba · 2 in the news
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)154150
Coding7966
Math6642
Reasoning & Knowledge8470
Agentic & Tools6488
Specifications
DeveloperMeta AIAlibaba
FamilyQwen
ReleasedApr 8, 2026Apr 20, 2026
Parameters
AvailabilityAPI access
Context window262K
Price — $/M input$1.04
Price — $/M output$6.24
Inputstext
Outputstext
Benchmarks
AIME 2024/202589%91%
FrontierMath39%23%
FrontierMath Tier 415%4%
GPQA Diamond90%89%
Humanity's Last Exam41%29%
SciCode52%47%
SimpleQA Verified66%57%
WebDev Arena15131486
τ²-bench92%96%
SimpleBench63%
SWE-bench Verified77%

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Is Muse Spark better than Qwen 3.6 Max (Preview)?

On Epoch AI's Capabilities Index, Muse Spark scores higher (154) than Qwen 3.6 Max (Preview) (150). The right pick depends on your task — compare their coding, math, and reasoning scores in the table above.

Which is better for coding, Muse Spark or Qwen 3.6 Max (Preview)?

Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, Muse Spark ranks higher — 79th vs 66th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.