← All models
Compare

Muse Spark vs Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B

Muse Spark (Meta AI) and Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B (Alibaba) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeMuse SparkMeta AI · 1 in the newsQwen 3.6 35B-A3BAlibaba · 3 in the news
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)154143
Coding7914
Math66
Reasoning & Knowledge8430
Agentic & Tools6450
Specifications
DeveloperMeta AIAlibaba
FamilyQwen
ReleasedApr 8, 2026Apr 14, 2026
Parameters
AvailabilityAPI accessOpen weights (unrestricted)
Context window262K
Price — $/M input$0.10
Price — $/M output$1.00
Inputstext, image, video
Outputstext
Benchmarks
AIME 2024/202589%
FrontierMath39%
FrontierMath Tier 415%
GPQA Diamond90%84%
Humanity's Last Exam41%20%
SciCode52%36%
SimpleQA Verified66%
WebDev Arena15131249
τ²-bench92%95%
Terminal-Bench25%
WeirdML34%

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Is Muse Spark better than Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B?

On Epoch AI's Capabilities Index, Muse Spark scores higher (154) than Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B (143). The right pick depends on your task — compare their coding, math, and reasoning scores in the table above.

Which is better for coding, Muse Spark or Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B?

Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, Muse Spark ranks higher — 79th vs 14th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.