← All models
Compare

Muse Spark vs Qwen 3.5 Plus (hosted 397B-A17B)

Muse Spark (Meta AI) and Qwen 3.5 Plus (hosted 397B-A17B) (Alibaba) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeMuse SparkMeta AI · 1 in the newsQwen 3.5 Plus (hosted 397B-A17B)Alibaba
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)154147
Coding7941
Math6625
Reasoning & Knowledge8433
Agentic & Tools6427
Specifications
DeveloperMeta AIAlibaba
FamilyQwen
ReleasedApr 8, 2026Feb 16, 2026
Parameters
AvailabilityAPI access
Context window
Price — $/M input
Price — $/M output
Inputs
Outputs
Benchmarks
AIME 2024/202589%85%
FrontierMath39%21%
FrontierMath Tier 415%2%
GPQA Diamond90%84%
Humanity's Last Exam41%
SciCode52%
SimpleQA Verified66%26%
WebDev Arena15131393
τ²-bench92%
APEX14%

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Is Muse Spark better than Qwen 3.5 Plus (hosted 397B-A17B)?

On Epoch AI's Capabilities Index, Muse Spark scores higher (154) than Qwen 3.5 Plus (hosted 397B-A17B) (147). The right pick depends on your task — compare their coding, math, and reasoning scores in the table above.

Which is better for coding, Muse Spark or Qwen 3.5 Plus (hosted 397B-A17B)?

Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, Muse Spark ranks higher — 79th vs 41th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.