← All models
Compare

LongCat 2.0 vs Qwen 3.7 Max

LongCat 2.0 (Meituan) and Qwen 3.7 Max (Alibaba) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeLongCat 2.0Meituan · 2 in the newsQwen 3.7 MaxAlibaba · 4 in the news
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)153
Coding1279
Math72
Reasoning & Knowledge4182
Agentic & Tools77
Specifications
DeveloperMeituanAlibaba
FamilyQwen
ReleasedJul 20, 2026May 19, 2026
Parameters
Availability
Context window1M1M
Price — $/M input$0.30$1.25
Price — $/M output$1.20$3.75
Inputstexttext
Outputstexttext
Benchmarks
GPQA Diamond78%92%
Humanity's Last Exam32%38%
SciCode35%49%
AIME 2024/202595%
SimpleBench70%
SimpleQA Verified59%
SWE-bench Verified77%
WebDev Arena1541
τ²-bench95%

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, LongCat 2.0 or Qwen 3.7 Max?

LongCat 2.0 is cheaper on input tokens at $0.30 per million, versus $1.25 (representative OpenRouter pricing).

Which has a larger context window, LongCat 2.0 or Qwen 3.7 Max?

LongCat 2.0 supports up to 1M tokens, compared with 1M for the other.

Which is better for coding, LongCat 2.0 or Qwen 3.7 Max?

Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, Qwen 3.7 Max ranks higher — 79th vs 12th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.