← All models
Compare

Ling-1T vs Muse Spark

Ling-1T (Ant Group) and Muse Spark (Meta AI) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeLing-1TAnt GroupMuse SparkMeta AI · 1 in the news
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)153
Coding1479
Math966
Reasoning & Knowledge1684
Agentic & Tools864
Specifications
DeveloperAnt GroupMeta AI
Family
ReleasedOct 10, 2025Apr 8, 2026
Parameters1T
AvailabilityOpen weights (unrestricted)API access
Context window
Price — $/M input
Price — $/M output
Inputs
Outputs
Benchmarks
AIME 2024/202571%89%
GPQA Diamond72%90%
Humanity's Last Exam7%41%
LiveCodeBench68%
MMLU-Pro82%
SciCode35%52%
τ²-bench33%92%
FrontierMath39%
FrontierMath Tier 415%
SimpleQA Verified66%
WebDev Arena1513

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Which is better for coding, Ling-1T or Muse Spark?

Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, Muse Spark ranks higher — 79th vs 14th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.