Compare
Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen 3.7 Max
Laguna S 2.1 (Poolside) and Qwen 3.7 Max (Alibaba) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.
- Laguna S 2.1 is cheaper on input tokens — $0.10 vs $1.25 per 1M.
- Laguna S 2.1 has a larger context window (1M vs 1M tokens).
| Attribute | Laguna S 2.1 | Qwen 3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| Scores | ||
| Intelligence (ECI) | — | 153 |
| Coding | — | 79 |
| Math | — | 72 |
| Reasoning & Knowledge | — | 82 |
| Agentic & Tools | — | 77 |
| Specifications | ||
| Developer | Poolside | Alibaba |
| Family | — | Qwen |
| Released | Jul 21, 2026 | May 19, 2026 |
| Parameters | — | — |
| Availability | — | — |
| Context window | 1M | 1M |
| Price — $/M input | $0.10 | $1.25 |
| Price — $/M output | $0.20 | $3.75 |
| Inputs | text | text |
| Outputs | text | text |
| Benchmarks | ||
| AIME 2024/2025 | — | 95% |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 92% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 38% |
| SciCode | — | 49% |
| SimpleBench | — | 70% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 59% |
| SWE-bench Verified | — | 77% |
| WebDev Arena | — | 1541 |
| τ²-bench | — | 95% |
Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, Laguna S 2.1 or Qwen 3.7 Max?
Laguna S 2.1 is cheaper on input tokens at $0.10 per million, versus $1.25 (representative OpenRouter pricing).
Which has a larger context window, Laguna S 2.1 or Qwen 3.7 Max?
Laguna S 2.1 supports up to 1M tokens, compared with 1M for the other.
Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.
More comparisons
Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.