← All models
Compare

Inkling vs Qwen 3.7 Max

Inkling (Thinking Machines) and Qwen 3.7 Max (Alibaba) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeInklingThinking Machines · 2 in the newsQwen 3.7 MaxAlibaba · 4 in the news
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)153
Coding6079
Math72
Reasoning & Knowledge6082
Agentic & Tools77
Specifications
DeveloperThinking MachinesAlibaba
FamilyQwen
ReleasedJul 15, 2026May 19, 2026
Parameters975B
AvailabilityOpen weights (unrestricted)
Context window524K1M
Price — $/M input$1.00$1.25
Price — $/M output$4.05$3.75
Inputstext, image, audiotext
Outputstexttext
Benchmarks
GPQA Diamond87%92%
Humanity's Last Exam30%38%
SciCode46%49%
AIME 2024/202595%
SimpleBench70%
SimpleQA Verified59%
SWE-bench Verified77%
WebDev Arena1541
τ²-bench95%

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Inkling or Qwen 3.7 Max?

Inkling is cheaper on input tokens at $1.00 per million, versus $1.25 (representative OpenRouter pricing).

Which has a larger context window, Inkling or Qwen 3.7 Max?

Qwen 3.7 Max supports up to 1M tokens, compared with 524K for the other.

Which is better for coding, Inkling or Qwen 3.7 Max?

Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, Qwen 3.7 Max ranks higher — 79th vs 60th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.