← All models
Compare

Inkling Small vs Qwen 3.7 Max

Inkling Small (Thinking Machines) and Qwen 3.7 Max (Alibaba) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeInkling SmallThinking Machines · 1 in the newsQwen 3.7 MaxAlibaba · 4 in the news
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)154
Coding7178
Math73
Reasoning & Knowledge6983
Agentic & Tools80
Specifications
DeveloperThinking MachinesAlibaba
FamilyQwen
ReleasedJul 30, 2026May 19, 2026
Parameters
Availability
Context window524K1M
Price — $/M input$0.58$1.48
Price — $/M output$1.44$4.42
Inputstext, image, audiotext
Outputstexttext
Benchmarks
GPQA Diamond90%92%
Humanity's Last Exam32%38%
SciCode49%49%
AIME 2024/202595%
SimpleBench70%
SimpleQA Verified59%
SWE-bench Verified77%
WebDev Arena1541
τ²-bench95%

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Inkling Small or Qwen 3.7 Max?

Inkling Small is cheaper on input tokens at $0.58 per million, versus $1.48 (representative OpenRouter pricing).

Which has a larger context window, Inkling Small or Qwen 3.7 Max?

Qwen 3.7 Max supports up to 1M tokens, compared with 524K for the other.

Which is better for coding, Inkling Small or Qwen 3.7 Max?

Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, Qwen 3.7 Max ranks higher — 78th vs 71th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.