← All models
Compare

Grok 4.5 vs Trinity Large Thinking

Grok 4.5 (xAI) and Trinity Large Thinking (Arcee AI) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeGrok 4.5xAI · 2 in the newsTrinity Large ThinkingArcee AI
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)154
Coding9112
Math85
Reasoning & Knowledge7025
Agentic & Tools7660
Specifications
DeveloperxAIArcee AI
FamilyGrok
ReleasedJul 8, 2026Apr 1, 2026
Parameters
AvailabilityAPI access
Context window500K262K
Price — $/M input$2.00$0.25
Price — $/M output$6.00$0.80
Inputstext, image, filetext
Outputstexttext
Benchmarks
AIME 2024/202598%
APEX34%
ARC-AGI87%
ARC-AGI-253%
GPQA Diamond93%75%
Humanity's Last Exam40%15%
SciCode54%36%
SimpleBench70%
SimpleQA Verified54%
WebDev Arena15511239
WeirdML46%
τ²-bench90%

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Grok 4.5 or Trinity Large Thinking?

Trinity Large Thinking is cheaper on input tokens at $0.25 per million, versus $2.00 (representative OpenRouter pricing).

Which has a larger context window, Grok 4.5 or Trinity Large Thinking?

Grok 4.5 supports up to 500K tokens, compared with 262K for the other.

Which is better for coding, Grok 4.5 or Trinity Large Thinking?

Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, Grok 4.5 ranks higher — 91th vs 12th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.