← All models
Compare

Grok 4.5 vs Qwen 3.6 Flash

Grok 4.5 (xAI) and Qwen 3.6 Flash (Alibaba) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeGrok 4.5xAI · 2 in the newsQwen 3.6 FlashAlibaba
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)154144
Coding91
Math8519
Reasoning & Knowledge7022
Agentic & Tools75
Specifications
DeveloperxAIAlibaba
FamilyGrokQwen
ReleasedJul 8, 2026Apr 27, 2026
Parameters
AvailabilityAPI access
Context window500K1M
Price — $/M input$2.00$0.19
Price — $/M output$6.00$1.13
Inputstext, image, filetext, image, video
Outputstexttext
Benchmarks
AIME 2024/202598%86%
APEX34%
ARC-AGI87%
ARC-AGI-253%
GPQA Diamond93%84%
Humanity's Last Exam40%
SciCode54%
SimpleBench70%35%
SimpleQA Verified54%21%
WebDev Arena1551
WeirdML46%
FrontierMath10%
FrontierMath Tier 40%

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok 4.5 better than Qwen 3.6 Flash?

On Epoch AI's Capabilities Index, Grok 4.5 scores higher (154) than Qwen 3.6 Flash (144). The right pick depends on your task — compare their coding, math, and reasoning scores in the table above.

Which is cheaper, Grok 4.5 or Qwen 3.6 Flash?

Qwen 3.6 Flash is cheaper on input tokens at $0.19 per million, versus $2.00 (representative OpenRouter pricing).

Which has a larger context window, Grok 4.5 or Qwen 3.6 Flash?

Qwen 3.6 Flash supports up to 1M tokens, compared with 500K for the other.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.