← All models
Compare

Grok 4.5 vs Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B

Grok 4.5 (xAI) and Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B (Alibaba) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeGrok 4.5xAI · 2 in the newsQwen 3.6 35B-A3BAlibaba · 3 in the news
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)154143
Coding9114
Math85
Reasoning & Knowledge7030
Agentic & Tools7550
Specifications
DeveloperxAIAlibaba
FamilyGrokQwen
ReleasedJul 8, 2026Apr 14, 2026
Parameters
AvailabilityAPI accessOpen weights (unrestricted)
Context window500K262K
Price — $/M input$2.00$0.10
Price — $/M output$6.00$1.00
Inputstext, image, filetext, image, video
Outputstexttext
Benchmarks
AIME 2024/202598%
APEX34%
ARC-AGI87%
ARC-AGI-253%
GPQA Diamond93%84%
Humanity's Last Exam40%20%
SciCode54%36%
SimpleBench70%
SimpleQA Verified54%
WebDev Arena15511249
WeirdML46%34%
Terminal-Bench25%
τ²-bench95%

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok 4.5 better than Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B?

On Epoch AI's Capabilities Index, Grok 4.5 scores higher (154) than Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B (143). The right pick depends on your task — compare their coding, math, and reasoning scores in the table above.

Which is cheaper, Grok 4.5 or Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B?

Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B is cheaper on input tokens at $0.10 per million, versus $2.00 (representative OpenRouter pricing).

Which has a larger context window, Grok 4.5 or Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B?

Grok 4.5 supports up to 500K tokens, compared with 262K for the other.

Which is better for coding, Grok 4.5 or Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B?

Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, Grok 4.5 ranks higher — 91th vs 14th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.