← All models
Compare

GPT-5 nano vs Muse Spark

GPT-5 nano (OpenAI) and Muse Spark (Meta AI) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeGPT-5 nanoOpenAIMuse SparkMeta AI · 1 in the news
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)141153
Coding2879
Math1366
Reasoning & Knowledge784
Agentic & Tools1164
Specifications
DeveloperOpenAIMeta AI
FamilyGPT
ReleasedAug 7, 2025Apr 8, 2026
Parameters
AvailabilityAPI accessAPI access
Context window400K
Price — $/M input$0.05
Price — $/M output$0.40
Inputstext, image, file
Outputstext
Benchmarks
AIME 2024/202581%89%
ARC-AGI21%
ARC-AGI-23%
FrontierMath8%39%
FrontierMath Tier 42%15%
GPQA Diamond69%90%
Humanity's Last Exam8%41%
LiveCodeBench79%
MATH Level 595%
MMLU-Pro78%
SciCode37%52%
SimpleQA Verified12%66%
Terminal-Bench22%
WeirdML38%
τ²-bench37%92%
WebDev Arena1513

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-5 nano better than Muse Spark?

On Epoch AI's Capabilities Index, Muse Spark scores higher (153) than GPT-5 nano (141). The right pick depends on your task — compare their coding, math, and reasoning scores in the table above.

Which is better for coding, GPT-5 nano or Muse Spark?

Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, Muse Spark ranks higher — 79th vs 28th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.