← All models
Compare

GPT-5.6 Sol vs Trinity Large Thinking

GPT-5.6 Sol (OpenAI) and Trinity Large Thinking (Arcee AI) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeGPT-5.6 SolOpenAI · 12 in the newsTrinity Large ThinkingArcee AI
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)162
Coding9512
Math97
Reasoning & Knowledge9525
Agentic & Tools6760
Specifications
DeveloperOpenAIArcee AI
FamilyGPT
ReleasedJul 9, 2026Apr 1, 2026
Parameters
AvailabilityAPI access
Context window1.1M262K
Price — $/M input$5.00$0.25
Price — $/M output$30.00$0.80
Inputsfile, image, texttext
Outputstexttext
Benchmarks
AIME 2024/2025100%
APEX40%
ARC-AGI98%
ARC-AGI-293%
GPQA Diamond93%75%
Humanity's Last Exam47%15%
SciCode56%36%
SimpleBench72%
SimpleQA Verified72%
WeirdML89%
τ²-bench85%90%
WebDev Arena1239

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, GPT-5.6 Sol or Trinity Large Thinking?

Trinity Large Thinking is cheaper on input tokens at $0.25 per million, versus $5.00 (representative OpenRouter pricing).

Which has a larger context window, GPT-5.6 Sol or Trinity Large Thinking?

GPT-5.6 Sol supports up to 1.1M tokens, compared with 262K for the other.

Which is better for coding, GPT-5.6 Sol or Trinity Large Thinking?

Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, GPT-5.6 Sol ranks higher — 95th vs 12th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.