← All models
Compare

GPT-5.1-Codex vs Muse Spark

GPT-5.1-Codex (OpenAI) and Muse Spark (Meta AI) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeGPT-5.1-CodexOpenAI · 2 in the newsMuse SparkMeta AI · 1 in the news
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)154
Coding5179
Math7766
Reasoning & Knowledge6084
Agentic & Tools5264
Specifications
DeveloperOpenAIMeta AI
FamilyGPT
ReleasedNov 12, 2025Apr 8, 2026
Parameters
AvailabilityAPI accessAPI access
Context window400K
Price — $/M input$1.25
Price — $/M output$10.00
Inputstext, image
Outputstext
Benchmarks
AIME 2024/202596%89%
APEX21%
GPQA Diamond86%90%
Humanity's Last Exam23%41%
LiveCodeBench85%
MMLU-Pro86%
SciCode40%52%
Terminal-Bench58%
WebDev Arena13311513
τ²-bench83%92%
FrontierMath39%
FrontierMath Tier 415%
SimpleQA Verified66%

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Which is better for coding, GPT-5.1-Codex or Muse Spark?

Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, Muse Spark ranks higher — 79th vs 51th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.