← All models
Compare

GLM-4.6 vs Muse Spark

GLM-4.6 (Z.ai (Zhipu AI),Tsinghua University) and Muse Spark (Meta AI) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeGLM-4.6Z.ai (Zhipu AI),Tsinghua University · 4 in the newsMuse SparkMeta AI · 1 in the news
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)141154
Coding2479
Math2166
Reasoning & Knowledge3084
Agentic & Tools1464
Specifications
DeveloperZ.ai (Zhipu AI),Tsinghua UniversityMeta AI
Family
ReleasedSep 30, 2025Apr 8, 2026
Parameters357B
AvailabilityOpen weights (unrestricted)API access
Context window205K
Price — $/M input$0.55
Price — $/M output$2.20
Inputstext
Outputstext
Benchmarks
AIME 2024/202586%89%
APEX4%
FrontierMath4%39%
FrontierMath Tier 42%15%
GPQA Diamond78%90%
Humanity's Last Exam13%41%
LiveCodeBench70%
MMLU-Pro83%
SciCode38%52%
Terminal-Bench25%
WebDev Arena13661513
τ²-bench70%92%
SimpleQA Verified66%

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Is GLM-4.6 better than Muse Spark?

On Epoch AI's Capabilities Index, Muse Spark scores higher (154) than GLM-4.6 (141). The right pick depends on your task — compare their coding, math, and reasoning scores in the table above.

Which is better for coding, GLM-4.6 or Muse Spark?

Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, Muse Spark ranks higher — 79th vs 24th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.