← All models
Compare

GLM-4.5 vs Muse Spark

GLM-4.5 (Z.ai (Zhipu AI),Tsinghua University) and Muse Spark (Meta AI) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeGLM-4.5Z.ai (Zhipu AI),Tsinghua University · 9 in the newsMuse SparkMeta AI · 1 in the news
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)153
Coding2579
Math1566
Reasoning & Knowledge2684
Agentic & Tools1564
Specifications
DeveloperZ.ai (Zhipu AI),Tsinghua UniversityMeta AI
Family
ReleasedAug 5, 2025Apr 8, 2026
Parameters355B
AvailabilityOpen weights (unrestricted)API access
Context window131K
Price — $/M input$0.60
Price — $/M output$2.20
Inputstext
Outputstext
Benchmarks
AIME 2024/202574%89%
GPQA Diamond78%90%
Humanity's Last Exam8%41%
LiveCodeBench74%
MMLU-Pro84%
SciCode35%52%
WeirdML41%
τ²-bench43%92%
FrontierMath39%
FrontierMath Tier 415%
SimpleQA Verified66%
WebDev Arena1513

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Which is better for coding, GLM-4.5 or Muse Spark?

Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, Muse Spark ranks higher — 79th vs 25th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.