← All models
Compare

Gemma 4 31B IT vs Muse Spark

Gemma 4 31B IT (Google DeepMind) and Muse Spark (Meta AI) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeGemma 4 31B ITGoogle DeepMindMuse SparkMeta AI · 1 in the news
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)142154
Coding3379
Math66
Reasoning & Knowledge2684
Agentic & Tools64
Specifications
DeveloperGoogle DeepMindMeta AI
FamilyGemma
ReleasedApr 2, 2026Apr 8, 2026
Parameters
AvailabilityOpen weights (restricted use)API access
Context window262K
Price — $/M input$0.10
Price — $/M output$0.35
Inputsimage, text, video
Outputstext
Benchmarks
SimpleQA Verified10%66%
WebDev Arena13801513
WeirdML52%
AIME 2024/202589%
FrontierMath39%
FrontierMath Tier 415%
GPQA Diamond90%
Humanity's Last Exam41%
SciCode52%
τ²-bench92%

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 4 31B IT better than Muse Spark?

On Epoch AI's Capabilities Index, Muse Spark scores higher (154) than Gemma 4 31B IT (142). The right pick depends on your task — compare their coding, math, and reasoning scores in the table above.

Which is better for coding, Gemma 4 31B IT or Muse Spark?

Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, Muse Spark ranks higher — 79th vs 33th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.