← All models
Compare

Gemini 3.6 Flash vs Qwen 3.7 Max

Gemini 3.6 Flash (Google) and Qwen 3.7 Max (Alibaba) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeGemini 3.6 FlashGoogle · 1 in the newsQwen 3.7 MaxAlibaba · 4 in the news
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)153
Coding8279
Math72
Reasoning & Knowledge8782
Agentic & Tools77
Specifications
DeveloperGoogleAlibaba
FamilyGeminiQwen
ReleasedJul 21, 2026May 19, 2026
Parameters
Availability
Context window1M1M
Price — $/M input$1.50$1.25
Price — $/M output$7.50$3.75
Inputstext, image, video, file, audiotext
Outputstexttext
Benchmarks
GPQA Diamond93%92%
Humanity's Last Exam38%38%
SciCode53%49%
AIME 2024/202595%
SimpleBench70%
SimpleQA Verified59%
SWE-bench Verified77%
WebDev Arena1541
τ²-bench95%

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.6 Flash or Qwen 3.7 Max?

Qwen 3.7 Max is cheaper on input tokens at $1.25 per million, versus $1.50 (representative OpenRouter pricing).

Which has a larger context window, Gemini 3.6 Flash or Qwen 3.7 Max?

Gemini 3.6 Flash supports up to 1M tokens, compared with 1M for the other.

Which is better for coding, Gemini 3.6 Flash or Qwen 3.7 Max?

Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, Gemini 3.6 Flash ranks higher — 82th vs 79th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.