← All models
Compare

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs Qwen 3.7 Max

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (Google) and Qwen 3.7 Max (Alibaba) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeGemini 3.5 Flash-LiteGoogleQwen 3.7 MaxAlibaba · 4 in the news
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)153
Coding3479
Math72
Reasoning & Knowledge3282
Agentic & Tools77
Specifications
DeveloperGoogleAlibaba
FamilyGeminiQwen
ReleasedJul 21, 2026May 19, 2026
Parameters
Availability
Context window1M1M
Price — $/M input$0.30$1.25
Price — $/M output$2.50$3.75
Inputstext, image, video, file, audiotext
Outputstexttext
Benchmarks
GPQA Diamond84%92%
Humanity's Last Exam18%38%
SciCode41%49%
AIME 2024/202595%
SimpleBench70%
SimpleQA Verified59%
SWE-bench Verified77%
WebDev Arena1541
τ²-bench95%

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite or Qwen 3.7 Max?

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is cheaper on input tokens at $0.30 per million, versus $1.25 (representative OpenRouter pricing).

Which has a larger context window, Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite or Qwen 3.7 Max?

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite supports up to 1M tokens, compared with 1M for the other.

Which is better for coding, Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite or Qwen 3.7 Max?

Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, Qwen 3.7 Max ranks higher — 79th vs 34th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.