← All models
Compare

Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Qwen 3.6 Max (Preview)

Gemini 3.1 Pro (Google DeepMind) and Qwen 3.6 Max (Preview) (Alibaba) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeGemini 3.1 ProGoogle DeepMind · 3 in the newsQwen 3.6 Max (Preview)Alibaba · 2 in the news
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)155150
Coding6566
Math7442
Reasoning & Knowledge9470
Agentic & Tools8388
Specifications
DeveloperGoogle DeepMindAlibaba
FamilyGeminiQwen
ReleasedFeb 19, 2026Apr 20, 2026
Parameters
AvailabilityAPI access
Context window262K
Price — $/M input$1.04
Price — $/M output$6.24
Inputstext
Outputstext
Benchmarks
AIME 2024/202596%91%
APEX34%
ARC-AGI98%
ARC-AGI-277%
FrontierMath37%23%
FrontierMath Tier 417%4%
GPQA Diamond94%89%
GSO (code optimization)23%
Humanity's Last Exam46%29%
METR task horizon6.4 h
SimpleBench80%63%
SimpleQA Verified77%57%
SWE-bench Verified76%77%
Terminal-Bench80%
WebDev Arena14611486
WeirdML72%
SciCode47%
τ²-bench96%

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 3.1 Pro better than Qwen 3.6 Max (Preview)?

On Epoch AI's Capabilities Index, Gemini 3.1 Pro scores higher (155) than Qwen 3.6 Max (Preview) (150). The right pick depends on your task — compare their coding, math, and reasoning scores in the table above.

Which is better for coding, Gemini 3.1 Pro or Qwen 3.6 Max (Preview)?

Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, Qwen 3.6 Max (Preview) ranks higher — 66th vs 65th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.