← All models
Compare

Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B

Gemini 3.1 Pro (Google DeepMind) and Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B (Alibaba) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeGemini 3.1 ProGoogle DeepMind · 3 in the newsQwen 3.6 35B-A3BAlibaba · 3 in the news
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)155143
Coding6514
Math74
Reasoning & Knowledge9430
Agentic & Tools8350
Specifications
DeveloperGoogle DeepMindAlibaba
FamilyGeminiQwen
ReleasedFeb 19, 2026Apr 14, 2026
Parameters
AvailabilityAPI accessOpen weights (unrestricted)
Context window262K
Price — $/M input$0.10
Price — $/M output$1.00
Inputstext, image, video
Outputstext
Benchmarks
AIME 2024/202596%
APEX34%
ARC-AGI98%
ARC-AGI-277%
FrontierMath37%
FrontierMath Tier 417%
GPQA Diamond94%84%
GSO (code optimization)23%
Humanity's Last Exam46%20%
METR task horizon6.4 h
SimpleBench80%
SimpleQA Verified77%
SWE-bench Verified76%
Terminal-Bench80%25%
WebDev Arena14611249
WeirdML72%34%
SciCode36%
τ²-bench95%

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 3.1 Pro better than Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B?

On Epoch AI's Capabilities Index, Gemini 3.1 Pro scores higher (155) than Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B (143). The right pick depends on your task — compare their coding, math, and reasoning scores in the table above.

Which is better for coding, Gemini 3.1 Pro or Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B?

Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, Gemini 3.1 Pro ranks higher — 65th vs 14th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.