← All models
Compare

Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Qwen 3.5 Flash (hosted 35B-A3B)

Gemini 3.1 Pro (Google DeepMind) and Qwen 3.5 Flash (hosted 35B-A3B) (Alibaba) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeGemini 3.1 ProGoogle DeepMind · 3 in the newsQwen 3.5 Flash (hosted 35B-A3B)Alibaba
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)155144
Coding656
Math7414
Reasoning & Knowledge9428
Agentic & Tools83
Specifications
DeveloperGoogle DeepMindAlibaba
FamilyGeminiQwen
ReleasedFeb 19, 2026Feb 25, 2026
Parameters
AvailabilityAPI access
Context window
Price — $/M input
Price — $/M output
Inputs
Outputs
Benchmarks
AIME 2024/202596%86%
APEX34%
ARC-AGI98%
ARC-AGI-277%
FrontierMath37%6%
FrontierMath Tier 417%0%
GPQA Diamond94%84%
GSO (code optimization)23%
Humanity's Last Exam46%
METR task horizon6.4 h
SimpleBench80%
SimpleQA Verified77%20%
SWE-bench Verified76%
Terminal-Bench80%
WebDev Arena14611237
WeirdML72%

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 3.1 Pro better than Qwen 3.5 Flash (hosted 35B-A3B)?

On Epoch AI's Capabilities Index, Gemini 3.1 Pro scores higher (155) than Qwen 3.5 Flash (hosted 35B-A3B) (144). The right pick depends on your task — compare their coding, math, and reasoning scores in the table above.

Which is better for coding, Gemini 3.1 Pro or Qwen 3.5 Flash (hosted 35B-A3B)?

Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, Gemini 3.1 Pro ranks higher — 65th vs 6th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.